A New York appellate court has ruled that a legal malpractice claim was barred by the state’s statute of limitations. In Frank Pace III v. Raisman & Associates, Esqs., LLP, a client retained an attorney to make an estate plan, including the creation of a trust. The purpose was to…
Boston Legal Malpractice Lawyer
Rosenbaum v. White, No. 11-3224: Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Case
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed a summary judgment for an attorney in a legal malpractice action. In Rosenbaum v. White, a client hired an attorney to form a new business venture, which would rehabilitate and then resell real estate. The client recruited a…
Tarrant v. Hudson, No. COA11-1311: North Carolina Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Case
A North Carolina appellate court has affirmed a summary judgment granted in favor of an attorney in a legal malpractice action. In Tarrant v. Hudson, a client suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident. The attorney who he hired to make a claim against the other driver in the accident,…
Hull v. Steinberg, No. 304275: Michigan Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Action
A Michigan appellate court has affirmed summary judgment in favor of an attorney in a legal malpractice case. In Hull v. Steinberg.doc, a husband and wife suffered serious personal injuries when their vehicle was stuck by tractor trailer. The couple retained an attorney to bring an action against the truck…
Cakarcan v. Law Offices of Steven Stoler & Assocs., LLP, No. B234359: California Appellate Court Affirms Demurrer in Legal Malpractice Action
A California appellate court has affirmed a ruling sustaining a demurrer of a second amended complaint alleging legal malpractice. In Cakarcan v. Law Offices of Steven Stoler & Assocs., LLP, a client retained an attorney to represent her in her divorce and child custody proceedings. Prior to the conclusion of…
Saffron v. Elhart, No. 301925: Michigan Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Case
A Michigan appellate court has affirmed a summary judgment in favor of an attorney in a legal malpractice action. In Saffron v. Elhart, a client retained an attorney to represent him in his divorce proceedings. During the trial, the client alleged that his former wife had gambled away almost $300,000…
Kaufman v. Jesser, No. CV-12-459-PHX-LOA: Arizona U.S. District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Legal Malpractice Case
The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona has denied an attorney’s motion to dismiss a legal malpractice action. In Kaufman v. Jesser, a client retained an attorney to pursue an action for medical malpractice against a veterinarian who treated the client’s exotic bird. The veterinarian had performed surgery…
Tidgewell v. David E. Gentry, APC, No. G044710: California Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Attorney in Legal Malpractice Suit
A California appellate court has affirmed a summary judgment in favor of an attorney in a legal malpractice action. In Tidgewell v. David E. Gentry, APC, a client hired an attorney to represent her in worker’s compensation claim and age discrimination suit against her employer. The attorney negotiated a settlement…
Puget Sound Electrical Workers Health Trust and Vacation Plan v. McKenzie Rothwell Barlow & Korpi, P.S., No. 65740-2-I: Washington Appellate Court Affirms Judgment for Client in Legal Malpractice Case
A Washington appellate court has affirmed a judgment in favor of a client in a legal malpractice action. In Puget Sound Electrical Workers Health Trust and Vacation Plan v. McKenzie Rothwell Barlow & Korpi, P.S.doc, an electrical worker’s union trust had a collective bargaining agreement with electrical contractors, which required…
Finley v. Zimmerman, No. A-1131-11T2: New Jersey Appellate Court Dismisses Legal Malpractice Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
A New Jersey appellate court has dismissed a legal malpractice case on the basis that there was no basis for personal jurisdiction over the defendant attorney. In Finley v. Zimmerman, a husband and wife sued their former attorney, a Florida lawyer, for negligence while representing them in the purchase of…